State-suppressed story update: Yes, no doubt ***** ***** is a Child Abuser

What’s happening with this story?  Well, plenty that I know of, and plenty that I don’t.  Even if this story were free of reporting restrictions (both generic family court restrictions, and injunctions specific to this case), I can’t speak of that to which I am not party – though I can well imagine where things are going in this case – but I can speak, albeit without disclosing names or evidence, of what I do know.
The burden upon me (and others) to withhold names and facts is not my doing, of course; rather, this suppression of the truth is the will of the State.  That I cannot give names, and that I cannot back up my assertions by publishing the facts, means that, thanks to the family law State tyranny, this article is open to the charge of being little more than an unsupported opinion piece.
That may be so, but I know what I know – I know the truth of this case – as based upon the facts in my possession, and I take heart from the fact that though I cannot simply and straightforwardly publish the truth (yet), activity on social media in recent months clearly demonstrates that many thousands of people have not believed the State-approved narrative.  If you’re one of those thousands to have seen through the police’s and court’s lies, one of the thousands to have said ‘The Judge’s version of events makes no sense, it’s clearly biased and illogical, turning the truth upside down; in fact, the Judge’s version is utterly ridiculous’ – if you’re one of the thousands of sensible people: Well Done.
Interestingly, despite the full backing of a biased Judge and the State, and despite the opportunity to have an unrestricted statement published by national media, the side of him – i.e. the Child Abuser – has mustered only a handful of people to support his Facebook and Twitter propaganda.  It’s very telling that whilst thousands of people back the innocent person, only a few dozen of his family and friends have been willing to take the Child Abuser’s side online (and, of course, some of these supporters are only doing it because if he goes down, so might they).
That isn’t what normally happens: the State’s silencing of its innocent victim together with the one-sided reporting of the State’s family court propaganda in the mainstream media will usually result in the general public swallowing a Judge’s lies and/or a Judge’s factually-incorrect opinions without question.  I really cannot emphasise enough that one of several remarkable things about this case is the public’s reaction: it speaks volumes that for once, thousands of people have spotted the lies and identified themselves as standing with the innocent victim.
What then, do I know?  Based upon facts and intel which I regret cannot be disclosed at this time, I am firmly persuaded that:
(1)  he is a Child Abuser, as are some of his friends and family, and he has abused not only his own children but also other children in the UK and abroad;
(2)  the Judge in this case is bent;
(3)  the police force responsible for investigating children’s allegations made against him failed in its duty to conduct a proper and thorough investigation;
(4)  she and her children are wholly innocent victims of yet another family courts atrocity.
Now, you may or may not agree with my four assertions as to the truth.  In a sense, it doesn’t matter, because the only thing which does matter is that the Judge has abandoned the truth in order to pursue and enforce the exact opposite of a just and fair outcome in this case, in the worst interests of the children.  The Judge is, we may reasonably assume, in the process of destroying the lives of the innocent whilst favouring the child-abusing guilty.  And in all probability, the right outcome in this case won’t happen because – regardless of the truth, which has already been discarded, and worse, inverted by the Judge – justice generally is denied to child abuse victims in our corrupt family courts.  Given it’s the norm that justice is denied to child abuse victims by the family courts, logic has to ask why this particular case would be a candidate for concluding any differently to all the other stitch-ups.
Which leads me to my final point in this brief article.  Just think about it.  You are a big-time, serial Child Abuser.  Thanks to some bent coppers and a bent Judge, you get away with your crimes – for the time being.  The bent Judge may even give you sole custody of your child abuse victims, leaving you free to carry on abusing the children, free to pass them round other child abusers, and free to make child pornography.  But – and it’s a big but – though you’ve escaped the noose for now, a lot of people now know all about you, your criminal activities and networks.  Justice seekers know about you.  Child protection campaigners know about you.  Victims’ and survivors’ groups know about you.  Journalists know about you.  Police officers, serving or retired, know about you.  Solicitors know about you.  Thousands of people know you’re a Child Abuser.  In view of that reality, how do you think life is going to pan out for you in the long term?
Justice – real justice, true justice – is always served in the end.  Though justice may tarry awhile, no man can escape the day of judgement ordained for him.  Better to repent before it’s too late.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

Sir Roger Moore on Paedophilia

The late Sir Roger Moore (in my opinion, the best Bond ever) wrote about much more than his acting career in his 2008 autobiography My Word is My Bond, which I read recently.
Moore touched briefly upon the subject of international paedophilia in chapter thirteen, where Sir Roger – who served for many years as a special representative for UNICEF – recounted his meeting with two street children in Brazil, a boy and a girl, both aged about twelve, and both of whom were forced into prostitution.
According to Moore, the girl was raped by a policeman at the age of eight.
Sir Roger explained that both children were “forced to go with men … usually foreigners, and mainly European paedophiles.”
Sickening though it is, to this day there are British ‘men’ who regularly travel far and wide to abuse women and children, and who even buy women, boys and girls for long-term exploitation as sex slaves.
For example, paedophiles from Rochdale are known to have abused children bought from Muslim gangs in Gaziantep.
The Turkish city of Gaziantep, long renowned as one of the largest exporters of carpets in the world, has in recent years become a honeypot drawing in child abusers seeking children for sale.
The prevalence of child sexual exploitation, right here on our doorsteps in Britain, is greater than most of us are aware and, in view of widespread indifference to it on the part of our increasingly corrupt authorities, it is a problem that looks set to grow worse.
Consider, for example, the shocking stories of police whistleblowers like Maggie Oliver and Jonathan Wedger.
Or you could ask questions of those who know what frequently happens to victims of child sexual abuse in the context of Family Court custody proceedings.  Our secretive Family Courts – widely acknowledged as corrupt – often give abusers access to or custody of their victims.
It ain’t right.  What are we going to do about it?
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Patrick Sookhdeo update

The February 2017 trial of Dr Patrick Sookhdeo at Snaresbrook Crown Court was postponed pending the outcome of an application to the Court of Appeal.
The application to the Court of Appeal presumably concerns Dr Sookhdeo’s extant wrongful convictions (dating to February 2015).  I do not know the outcome/current status of this application to appeal.
Presumably the current prosecution of Dr Sookhdeo – regarding a 1977 allegation, first complained of in November 2015 – will remain on hold until the application to appeal is finally resolved.
Sub judice criteria currently prevent journalists from publishing a significant volume of information about Dr Sookhdeo’s wrongful convictions (or, of course, the current prosecution).
Neither Dr Sookhdeo’s past accuser (2014) nor his current accuser (2015) can be publicly identified in Britain.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , ,

Theresa May: hollow words on Islamic terrorism

This morning Theresa May addressed Parliament about yesterday’s London terror attack.  Would it be harsh of me to criticise the Prime Minister’s propaganda?
The PM spoke of Britain never bowing to terrorism.  No doubt Theresa May’s words were very well intended.  She may even sincerely believe what she said.  But is it true?
The truth is that the British Government has a long record of giving in to terrorism.
From India, Palestine and Malaya to Cyprus, Aden and Kenya – and not forgetting Northern Ireland – in the last century the British Government has repeatedly given in to the demands of terrorists.
In all of these instances, terrorists succeeded in their aims against the British Government.  Terrorism may not have been the only factor at play in shaping the policy and actions of the British Government, but it was a significant factor, and sometimes the key factor.
The British Government has been appeasing Islam in Britain since at least the 1990s.  And the British Government is appeasing Islam to this day.
Will Britain really never bow to Islam?  Whilst there are still many good British people who would fight to the death to defend Britain against Islamic tyranny, I can’t say I’m over confident about Britain’s future prospects.
The truth is that Britain is already a long way down the road to being conquered by the Muslims.  The danger is real and the threat continues to grow.
We need more than words from the Prime Minister.  The root of the problem must be tackled – and tackled properly.  The root of the problem is the spirit and ideology of Islam.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Met Police child prostitution cover up: Detective Jonathan Wedger tells all

Explosive corruption allegations that have the Met in meltdown: the top-level Metropolitan Police cover up of child prostitution.  Full transcript of whistleblowing detective Jonathan Wedger here.
Original audio source
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Richard Whiteley a Spy – really?

Ricky Tomlinson claimed that the late Richard Whiteley was “a member of the intelligence services” yesterday.
Tomlinson is reported by the Chester Chronicle as saying that Whiteley “hosted” the 1973 ITV documentary The Red Under The Bed – the broadcasting of which Tomlinson believes may have swayed the jury against him at his noteworthy 1973 trial.
However, according to the British Film Institute (BFI), neither the BFI’s Richard Whiteley page nor the BFI’s The Red Under The Bed page have any reference to Whiteley in that programme.
Intriguing.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Bristol Preachers trial: the WRONG verdict: Mike Overd and Michael Stockwell convicted of public disorder crime

Two of the four ‘Bristol Preachers’ – Don Karns and Adrian Clark – were previously cleared of charges of public disorder, but, at the end of a trial at Bristol Magistrates’ Court, lay magistrates have today convicted the other two Christians – Mike Overd and Michael Stockwell – of public disorder offences.
COMMENT: The convictions of Overd and Stockwell are wrong verdicts according to law.
In July 2016, the four Christian men were preaching – quite lawfully – about their Christian beliefs in a public place in Bristol; they were certainly not bent on causing any trouble.  They were not violent and did not incite violence.  They spoke no profane words.
In Britain we cherish liberty and the rule of law.  We do not live according to yobs’ mob rule.  Police officers are supposed to uphold the law and protect the right of law-abiding people to speak in public – not side with the mob against public speakers whom the yobs want to silence.
It’s yobs and mobs that engage in public disorder – not peaceful Christian evangelists.
In the modern era, the persecution in Britain of Christian public speakers (and others) began with the Public Order Act 1986.  Football hooliganism and serious industrial strife were the context in which this law was introduced.
The Public Order Act 1986 was never intended to silence or make criminals of Christian street preachers (or others) peacefully expressing their beliefs in public.
Expect an appeal against these wrongful convictions…
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,